Sunday, February 16, 2014

Chaos Across Disciplines: A notion of chaos, consilience and enlightenment, review on “Back from Chaos” by E.O. Wilson in 1998


In the article  entitled “Back from Chaos”in by  E.O. Wilson in 1998, by the use of the term “chaos” he  refers to different kind of ongoing conflicts, contradictions in  splitting relationship among  different spheres of academia and philosophies such as  pure sciences, social sciences and the  humanities.  In order to address such conflicts and contradiction he says Wilson (1998: 41) points to an “ongoing fragmentation of knowledge and resulting chaos in philosophy.” He believes that there is a lack of communication between discrete academic disciplines such as science and humanities with their own way of interpretations standards. As a result, there is lot of chaos in philosophy,. Wilson holds that these fragmentations “are not reflections of the real world but artifacts of scholarship.”  Wilson uses  the term “consilience” or the unity of knowledge, from the Victorian philosopher of science, William  referring that “consilience” is the key to  unification of these  chaos  in philosophy in past few centuries. Wilson takes an even broader view of consilience. He is convinced that  there is inherent unity and objectivity of all knowledge. Thus, consilience would help in linking  theories, facts and knowledge across disciplines to create a common platform for explanation. Wilson also believes that in the gathering of  specialists across disciplines, they can reach to an agreement on “a common body of abstract principles” with trust in consilience as the foundation of natural sciences and its branches and also among social sciences to reduce the chaos in their philosophies. Wilson believes that intellectual unity can be created by extending the method of reductionism, widely used in the natural sciences, to all areas of knowledge.

When Wilson states that science is  the engine of Enlightenment, he may be meaning that the natural sciences in the past has provided the methods to acquire reliable knowledge about the world of which we are a part of. Rather than a mere act of faith taken on authority, the naturalist’s intellectual convictions about the forces governing the material universe are inspired by this scientific progress.  And the successes of the naturalistic worldview go beyond mere intellectual achievements. The extension of theoretical knowledge made possible by modern scientific investigation has been endlessly and creatively applied in the development of new technologies, a medium for social cooperation. These advances have given human beings unprecedented power in predicting, controlling, and protecting nature, all in the service of our flourishing on Earth.  

No comments: